List of the 12 Seas Surrounding the Pacific Ocean

The Pacific Ocean is the largest of the worlds five oceans. It has a total area of 60.06 million square miles (155.557 million sq km) and it stretches from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the Southern Ocean in the south and has coastlines along the continents of Asia, Australia, North America, and South America. In addition, some areas of the Pacific Ocean feed into what is called a marginal sea instead of pushing right up against the coastlines of the aforementioned continents. By definition, a marginal sea is an area of water that is a partially enclosed sea adjacent to or widely open to the open ocean. Confusingly a marginal sea is also sometimes referred to as a Mediterranean sea, which shouldnt be confused with the actual sea named the Mediterranean.   Marginal Seas of the Pacific Ocean The Pacific Ocean shares its borders with 12 different marginal seas. The following is a list of those seas arranged by area.   Philippine Sea Area: 2,000,000 square miles (5,180,000 sq km) Coral Sea Area: 1,850,000 square miles (4,791,500 sq km) The South China Sea Area: 1,350,000 square miles (3,496,500 sq km) Tasman Sea Area: 900,000 square miles (2,331,000 sq km) Bering Sea Area: 878,000 square miles (2,274,020 sq km) The East China Sea Area: 750,000 square miles (1,942,500 sq km) The Sea of Okhotsk Area: 611,000 square miles (1,582,490 sq km) The Sea of Japan Area: 377,600 square miles (977,984 sq km) Yellow Sea Area: 146,000 square miles (378,140 sq km) Celebes Sea Area: 110,000 square miles (284,900 sq km) Sulu Sea Area: 100,000 square miles (259,000 sq km) The Sea of Chiloà © Area: Unknown The Great Barrier Reef The Coral Sea located in the Pacific Ocean is home to one of natures greatest wonders, the Great Barrier Reef. It is the world largest coral reef system which is made up of almost 3,000 individual corals. Off the coast of Australia, the Great Barrier Reef is one of the nations most popular tourist destinations. For the Aboriginal population of Australia, the reef is culturally and spiritually important. The reef is home to 400 types of coral animals and over 2,000 species of fish. Much of the marine life that calls the reef home, like sea turtles and several whale species.   Unfortunately, climate change is killing the Great Barrier Reef. Rising ocean temperatures cause coral to release  the algae that not only live in it but is the main source of food for the coral. Without its algae, the coral is still alive but is slowly starving to death. This release of algae is known as coral bleaching. By 2016 over 90 percent of the Reef had suffered from coral bleaching and 20 percent of the coral had died. As even humans depend upon coral reef ecosystems for food the loss of the world largest coral reef system would have devastating effects on the plant. Scientists  hope they can stem the tide of climate change and preserve natural wonders like coral reefs.

Behavior and Communication

The Death Penalty Is More Expensive Than Housing - 1610 Words

The death penalty is a hot button issue in contemporary American politics. There are many sides and stances that need to be addressed in order to truly understand the issue. The three main arguments for or against the death penalty tend to be focused around three main areas: fiscal issues, moral issues, and crime prevention issues. Many Americans are concerned about the cost of capital punishment, specifically; the cost of the death penalty per inmate, per year. Is it actually cheaper for the taxpayer to provide room and board for an inmate for life? Or is it cheaper to use expensive chemicals to help the inmate meet a swift, yet peaceful end. In theory, the death penalty is less expensive than housing an inmate for life without parole, though there are several other factors, including extended trials that should be adder ssed. At what point is the price too high to have an inmate on death row? Are is it a guaranteedShow MoreRelatedThe Death Penalty Is Not A Deterrent951 Words   |  4 PagesCrying Over Spilled Milk The death penalty is a lot like the statement â€Å"crying over spilled milk† in the sense that it is pointless and makes no real difference with regards to the situation. The death penalty was created as a punishment for crimes committed, but even from the beginning crime was still a problem and the punishment was not a deterrent. The history concerning the death penalty is extensive and can be found documented all the way back to Ancient Babylon in 18th Century BC (Reggio)Read MoreEssay on I Am Against the Death Penalty787 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Death Penalty The death penalty is the worst that can happen to a criminal if he is tried for murder, treason, or airplane hijacking. This is a very touchy subject for politicians also. Many politicians will not even speak about it for fear of looking too soft on crime, or, if they are in favor of it they will look too barbaric and uncivilized. A recent poll shows that the American population is split nearly half-and-half on the topic. In the poll, 41% preferred the death penalty, 44%Read MoreThe Death Penalty Is Wrong1321 Words   |  6 PagesThe death penalty is a controversial issue in Texas. People support it because they are unaware of the unknown facts. People believe that the death penalty guarantees criminals being punished and justice being made. However, there are innocent people who have died because of the hateful vengeance by the prosecutor seeks. There are many reasons as to why the death penalty is wrong. There are many ways of killing the defendant after they have been senten ced to the death penalty, some of these includeRead MoreThe Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty Essay examples1210 Words   |  5 PagesIn the world we as people live in violence. Violence has gotten so out of control that it has affected everyone. The one thing about violence is that it also leads to crimes. And crimes leads to some people being imprisoned, while others are put on death row. But if crimes are crimes, what makes them minor or major? Who decides if they are minor or major? Nowadays minor and major crimes are being pushed together. For example, someone gets shot and the shooter gets 5 years in prison. But if someoneRead MoreCapital Punishment And The Death Penalty947 Words   |  4 PagesEver since the eighteenth century there has been thousands of deaths in the United States because of the death penalty. While having an inmate sit in a jail cell for life can cost taxpayers a lot of money, I feel as if we should find alternative ways to hand down consequences because it does not decrease the murder rate, Taxpayers put millions of dollars into the death penalty system, The death penalty puts innocent lives in danger, and we force other civilians to kill another human being. AlthoughRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Not Be Considered Unethical Or Inhumane1569 Words   |  7 Pagessuch as the death penalty should not be considered unethical or inhumane. The death penalty may be difficult to understand, but based on recent studies, it is nearly proven that the death penalty will save money along with many other benefits. By using the death penalty it will eliminate same person crimes, will cause fear, will save money, and will open a jail cell. Also, fewer criminals will provide more food, shelter and drinks for crimes that aren’t as bad. By using the death penalty it would benefitRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is A Good Way Of Handling Criminals Essay928 Words   |  4 Pages The death penalty has been a way of executing prisoners who commit heinous crimes. This means of trial by death has been around for a long time, even dating back to 1608, when Captain George Kendall became the first to be executed by hanging, ultimately establishing the death penalty (Death penalty throughout, 2016). Many people are in favor of the death penalty but many others are not. This paper will describe the positive effects of this penalty and how it is a better way of handling prisonersRead MoreCapital Punishment Should Not Be Banned1581 Words   |  7 Pagesand it can cost the lives of innocent people. The death penalty is a legal punishment of execution when a capital crime has been committed. In the United States, there are 41 capital offenses that are legally punishable by death. The death penalty dates back to various centuries ago and it is still used in today’s world. Each year, thousands of people are put on death row for an average of fifteen to twenty years . Several people that are put on death row are found to be innocent only after wastingRead MoreThe Punishment Of A Prison1357 Words   |  6 Pageslife can make a significant contribution to the public if given the chance. The death penalty eliminates any chance of such people being able to give back to families of victims or society in general. Immanuel Kant, a pious Lutheran, thought the essence of morality was the Golden Rule: do on to others the way you would have them do on to you. Although this famous philosopher was not necessarily against the death penalty, his moral theories support the abolition of such a heinous act. Kant was wellRead MoreThe Death Penalty Is More Expensive Than Life Without Parole1739 Words   |  7 PagesA. Cost The death penalty is a more expensive than the alternative life without the possibility of parole option in monetary terms, time, and resources spent. It is acknowledged that there is no national figure for the exact cost of the death penalty but many states and researchers do have estimates. All of which concluding that the death penalty is the more expensive than life without parole. This option is gradually becoming more expensive with each passing years due to factors that will be discussed

WHAT MADE THE AMERICANS EXPAND WESTWARD Essay Example For Students

WHAT MADE THE AMERICANS EXPAND WESTWARD? Essay After the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, a large amount of land west of the original 13 states and the Northwest Territory was acquired. The open land, additional benefits and other existing problems encouraged Americans to expand westward.The American people began to realize that the future of the country lay in the development of its own western resources. There were many reasons that made the people face the grueling and dangerous movement west, but the primary reason was economy. Like the Spanish conquistadors before them, the Americans looked beyond the Mississippi, they saw an open beckoning. Despite the presence of hundreds of Indian nations with rich and distinct cultures, who had populated the land for thousands of years-from the desert of the Southwest and the grassy prairies of the Great Plains to the high valleys of the Rocky Mountains and the salty beaches of the Pacific Coast-Americans considered the west to be an empty wilderness. And in less than fifty years, from the 1803 purchase of Louisiana Territory to the California gold rush of 1849, the nation would expand and conquer the West (Herb 3). The ocean had always controlled New Englands interests and connected it with the real world. Puritanism was still very strong in the north so the moral unity of New England was exceptional. Having a very unmixed population of English origin, New England contrasted very much with the other sections. All this and the fact that they needed to cross populated states in order to expand west set this section part from the others (Leuetenburg and Wishy 37). New Englands population compared to other regions was poor, and the population growth was even poorer. The trans-Alleghany States by 1820 had a population of about 2.25 million, while New England had over 1.5 million. Ten years later, western states had over 3.5 million with the people northwest of the Ohio River alone numbering 1.5 million. In 1820 the total population of New England was about to equal to the combined population of New York and New Jersey; but its increase between 1820 and 1830 was hardly three hundred thousand, not much over half that of New York, and less that of gain of Ohio. If Maine, the growing state of the group, be excluded, the increase of the whole section was less that of the frontier state of Indiana(Turner 41) Fortunately, new manufactures help save New England from becoming an entirely stationary section (Turner 12). New Englands shipping industry became very strong because it had control of neutral trade during the European wars. Of the exports of the United States in 1820, the statistics gave to New England about twenty percent, nine-tenths of which were from Massachusetts(Turner 11). Then in a short period of time, the section witnessed a transfer of the industrial center of gravity from the harbors to the waterfalls, from the commerce and navigation to manufacturers (Turner 13). Water power became the sites of factory towns, and the industrial revolution which, in the time of the embargo, began to transfer industries from the household to the factory, was rapidly carried on(Turner 14). A new class began to develop. Farmers moved into towns, and their daughters began to work in mills. Agriculture, though still very important to many New England people, became a declining interest. By 1830 New England was importing corn and flour in large quantities from other sections. The raising of cattle and sheep increased as grain cultivation declined(Turner 46). With the cattle and sheep raising becoming more popular, it encouraged emigration from New England because it decreased the number of small farms. By the sale of their lands to wealthier neighbors, the New England farmers were able to go west with money to invest(Turner 15). The Middle Region, which included New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, was a transition zone. It connected the north along with the south and the east with the west. Geographically, they (the states) lay on the line of natural routes between the Atlantic on the one side, and the Ohio and the Great Lakes on the other(Turner 10). Compared to New England, this section was rapidly growing region. By 1830, New York had already equaled the total population of entire New England combined. Eventually, New York and Pennsylvania would become the most populous states in the union. Vaccine Essay As the movement of capital and population to the interior went on, wealth was drained from the coast(Turner 57). As the value of their lands declined, the people of the south coast naturally sought for an explanation and remedy to the problem (Turner 61):Instead of applying a system of scientific farming and replenishment of the soil, there was a tendency for the planters who remained to get into debt in order to add to their possessions the farms which offered for sale by the movers. Thus there was a flow of wealth towards the west of pay for these new purchases(Turner 61). It was because of the sudden shift of labor from farms to towns that started the westward movement up north. The herding of cattle and sheep took place of agriculture. So the owners of small farms sold their farms and moved west. In the middle region, it was a lack of transportation and market that brought along the Erie Canal. After its completion, NY and the rest of the middle region would be connected with the rest of the interior of the country. The people began to move inland along the canal. The invention of the cotton gin at a very fitting time made people of the south push west. With textile being a booming industry, people went west to fin available land to plant cotton. So how were these moves based on economics? Why did the farmers of the north decide to move west? Was farming profitable anymore? Farming out west could be even more profitable. When wild lands sold for two dollars an acre, and indeed, could be occupied by squatters almost without molestation, it was certain that settlers would seek them instead of paying twenty to fifty dollars and acre for farms that lay not much farther to the east-particularly when the western lands were more fertile(Turner 73). If they could find someone to buy their land, farmers would be happier to go west to start a bigger and better farm on more fertile soil. The middle region moved inward along with the canal. With cities like Cleveland developing inland, and with help of the canal making everything more accessible, settlers moved inward. The struggle of Baltimore, New York City and Philadelphia for the rising commerce of the interior was potent factor in the development of the middle region(Turner 69). With the lands being practically free in this vast area, not only did it attract the settler, but it also furnished the opportunity for all men to hew out their own careers (Turner 68). The open land gave people a chance to start over. The wilderness opened a gate to escape the poor, the discontented and the oppressed(Turner 68). What was the reason behind the movement west of the South? The expansion of the south was based on the strong demand for cotton. the Industrial Revolution, which made textile manufacturing a large-scale operation, castly increased the demand for raw cotton(Westward Expansion and Regional Differences). Since the invention of the cotton gin made the cultivation of cotton profitable, it was only a question of finding the land to cultivate the cotton. All the people had to do was look westward. What made the people move west? Economics, land, and opportunity to profit were primary factors. With three thousand miles of free and available land, and the opportunity to start a new and better life, and make more money doing it, people packed their bags and moved in. WORKS CITEDHerb, Angela M. Beyond the Mississippi: Early Westward Expansion of the United States. New York: Lodestar Books, 1996. Leuehtenburg, William E., and Bernard Wishy, eds Fronteir and Section. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1961. Turner, Fredrick Jackson. The Frontier in American History. New York: Holt, Tinehart, and Winston Inc., 1962Turner, Fredrick Jackson. Rise of the New West. New york: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1966. Turner, Fredrick Jackson. The United States 1830-1850. New York: W.W. Norton ; Company Inc., 1965. Westward Expansion and Regional Differences. An Outline of American History. Downloaded from AOL. March 27, 1999. History

Kadeejah Johnson Essays (496 words) - Neuropsychological Assessment

Kadeejah Johnson Education 201 Professor A. Baker April 29, 2016 Chapter 15: Physical and Cognitive Development in Middle Adulthood Chapter 15: Apply (page 406) Between ages 40 and 50, Nancy gained 20 pounds. She also began to have trouble opening tightly closed jars, and her calf muscles ached after climbing a flight of stairs "Exchanging muscle for fat must be an ine vitable part of aging, "Nancy thought, is she correct? Why or why not? She is correct because the rise in fat largely affects the torso and occurs as fatty deposits within the body cavity; as fat beneath the skin on the limbs declines. On average, size of the abdomen increases 7 to 14 percent. Women tend to have a large portion due to weight gain, age-related changes in muscle-fat makeup also contribute. In the forties and fif ties muscle mass declines very gradually, which is largely due to atrophy of fast-twitch fibers, which are responsible for speed and explosive strength. Chapter 15: Reflect (page 412) Which midlife health problem is of greatest personal concern to you? What steps can you take now to help prevent it? I was having trouble getting up in the mornings and seemed to have less energy than most people my age. Some of my friends started to make comment s about my weight . They tried to make them in a teasing way, but my feel ings were hurt. I tried to tell myself that I didn't have a problem because I went to work every day and took care of my f amily. I felt I was a social eater, and that I didn't have an out of control issue . Finally, I decided that I needed to do something about my weight . I asked my doctor where to get help. I got the help I needed and now feel very proud of myself for takin g control of my eating and wiegh t . Chapter 15: Review (419) How do slowing of cognitive processing, reduced working-memory capacity, and difficulties with inhibition affect memory in midlife? What can older adults do to compensate for these declines? In many ways, our memories shape who we are. They ma ke up our internal biographies the stories we tell ourselves about what we've done with our lives. Our memories tell us who we're connected to, who we've touched during our lives, and who has touched us. In short, our memories are crucial to the essence of who we are as human beings. Memory loss also affects the practical side of life. Remembering how to get from your house to the grocery store or how to do the tasks that make up your job allows you to take care of your needs. That's what makes dementia so scary losing your memory means both losing your ability to live independently and not being able to remember your past experiences.

Capitalism and World Inequality

Introduction The concept of capitalism has been in existence since time immemorial. While on one hand there are those who are ardent supporters of the concept, there are others who feel that this concept has not been of any benefit to the world. Some people argue that capitalism is only a tool for the rich and well established countries which they use to propagate their selfish motives at the expense of poor or third world countries.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Capitalism and World Inequality specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Johan Noberg argues that, â€Å"the world’s inequality is due to capitalism. Not to capitalism having made certain groups poor, but to its making its practitioners wealthy.† This paper takes a critical look at this quote and attempts to demystify it in order to establish the correct position as far as capitalism is concerned. Background Information It has been said that clos e to the total number of resources that are available world over are consumed by only a small percentage of its population. To be precise, more than 80 percent of the world’s resources are under the control and strict management of about 20 percent of the entire population of the world. The other 80 percent of the population have to share the 20% and since it is hardly enough, they have to fight for it and it is survival for the fittest. That is without a doubt a great form of inequality. The big question however is, what causes this great discrepancy and discordance? Are the developing countries or the peripheral countries poor because the developed countries are rich? Would that be a valid argument? Does it mean that if the 1st world countries were less rich then the poor countries would be doing better? It is obviously a misconception when we assume that those countries that are rich are the cause of poverty that the third world countries experience. Production of Resource s Noberg notes that most of the countries that are doing well economically, for example the United States of America were colonies and that they had a lot of catching up to do after they gained independence. Surprisingly, some of the countries that are least developed, for instance, Liberia and Afghanistan were not colonized and have had control of their resources from the word go (Noberg 154-155). The main reason however why only about 20 percent of the world’s population has control of close to 80 percent of the world’s resources is because the same countries are in charge of production of these massive resources. Therefore, the problem that needs to be addressed is the fact that many people in the world are generally poor, and not because there are other people who are rich. Argument against capitalism Those who advance arguments against capitalism are of the opinion that looking at the per capita GDP of some of the rich countries and in comparison to the per capita of poor countries, the former is said to be 30 times higher (Peet 94). It is because of this observation that critics argue that this inequality is caused by capitalism.Advertising Looking for essay on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More While they may be right in making such a conclusion, they are definitely mistaken in regard to the reasons they give. Most of the countries that have prospered economically have taken the path of capitalism while those that have resulted in communism while impeding production, trade and ownership have always experienced economic hardships. There are natural factor that may be considered to have played a role in determining the prosperity of some countries. Factors such as climate, natural calamities among others have undermined the economic development of some countries. Countries that have more than half of the land being a desert or countries that continually experience natu ral calamities such as earthquakes and floods have been affected in terms of economic development. This not withstanding, the kind of economic strategies that countries have taken happen to be the great determinants of how well their economy has been thriving; the main issue therefore is whether a country is liberal or controlling in terms of management of resources. Liberal countries have managed to gain a stable ground and are now very prosperous while those that are controlling tend to lag behind in terms of development and economic growth. Studies conducted have shown that the GDP of countries that are liberal is way higher, close to two times higher, than the GDP of those countries that have remained less liberal and more controlling. Looking at this situation, then it is clear that the discrepancy that exists could be reduced if the developing countries would agree into becoming more liberal thereby accessing open markets and free economy. Some countries in the periphery that have since discovered the need to embrace liberty have experienced exponential growth and this has seen them grow not only faster than other third world countries but a lot faster than some of the 1st word countries. Putting the record straight Taking into consideration the above discussion, then there is need to revisit the quote by Johan Noberg, â€Å"the world’s inequality is due to capitalism. Not to capitalism having made certain groups poor, but to its making its practitioners wealthy.† In simplified language, Noberg is simply arguing that the inequality in terms of distribution of resources in the world has been caused not directly by capitalism but because capitalism in itself is unevenly distributed. When we consider the aspects of investment and trade, we realize that they tend to flow evenly only in the economies that are more liberal and open to the rest of the world. This shows that economic development is not usually achieved in isolation (Kegley and Shan non 23). For a country to grow and develop in terms of the economy, it must get support and investment both within (domestic) and also from outside (foreign).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Capitalism and World Inequality specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Therefore, a country that does not create conducive environment for foreign investors to come invest will always have an economic go slow in terms of growth. An economy that is considered closed to the rest of the world is one that is attempting to flourish in isolation. The result of such a move is that since there is no external intervention, there is no much investment from the outside world and the result is that the economy of such a country becomes stunted in its growth (Harvey 345). Between the years 1988 and 1998, an estimated quarter of all the total direct investments from the international community were channeled to the developing economies. Since t he 80s the amount of direct investments from affluent countries to the developing ones has been increasing. However, it is not all developing countries that have been developing from these direct investments. Instead, it is only those that have made it possible for foreign investments to come into their country that have become more liberal. Those countries that have since decided to become more liberal have not only experienced tremendous growth in their economy but have almost outdone or at least managed to catch up with those that are considered affluent (Soros 88). It has therefore become more apparent that for the countries that want to catch up in terms of economic growth thereby becoming more liberal and open to the rest of the world is the best way to go about it. Chairman of the Panel of Imminent Persons, Koffi Anaan, when still holding the office of the Secretary General to the United Nations was quoted to have said that the world is unequal and in view of this, the main l osers are not so much those who have had a fair share of exposure to globalization, but more so, those who have been left out of the globalization concept. When critics argue that capitalism is by large to blame for the uneven distribution of resources and therefore inequality in economic development, then such can be said to be contradicting (Hutton and Giddens 123). The argument by critics is that many well established corporations and companies only want to invest in countries that are well established and stable as far as the economy is concerned. Critics further argue that when corporation go to poor countries and decide to set base, it is only because they will get low cost of production due to cheap labour and therefore do so at the expense of the labour force in that country leading to economic stagnation and redundancy. Going back to the sentiments made by the former UN Secretary General, it becomes apparent that those countries which would rather not participate in globali zation stand back, they tend to marginalize themselves and they are not marginalized as critics would want the rest of the world to believe.Advertising Looking for essay on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Practical examples will go along way in this discussion to demonstrate that there has always been a misconception regarding capitalism. Economic studies that have been conducted over time have taken side to side comparisons of countries that have embraced openness and free economy as opposed to those who have kept off (Ross and Kent 231). Countries such as South Korea, Taiwan and West Germany have been seen to be better off economically due to the liberal nature than their counterparts such as China and North Korea (Biel 55). When a country embraces economic freedom, there is always a notable growth with the per capita GDP increasing. As a result, the standards of living are improved and the life of the society in general improves. Even critics cannot deny the fact that capitalism is pathway to prosperity. This therefore means those who are yet to embrace the concept of liberalism need to lobby for liberalization of trade so that the poor countries can benefit as well. It may not be easy to make critics see the merits or advantages of liberalism. They are adamant in believing that there is any good that can come out of a concept which they verily believe is the cause of the gap in economic development that exists between the core and the periphery countries. Equal Distribution Although the concept of capitalism cannot be blamed for the inequality that exists in the world today, developed countries have been accused of protectionism, an aspect that has continued to affect the poor countries. For instance, the United States of America as well as the European Union is known for offering subsidies to the textile and agricultural sectors. As a result, these sectors in the third world countries are deprived a competitive advantage since the product from the EU and American markets are way cheaper that people opt for them instead of the products from the developing countries. It therefore becomes very hard for the economies of such countries to thrive and especially when the sectors affected are the backbone of the economy of such countries. The Western World The western world where the core countries or the first w3orld countries are concentrated have for a long time appeared seemingly concerned in the plight of the third world countries and even appeared as though they are interested in helping these countries come out of the woods (Centeno and Joseph 45).. However, economic analysts a lot of lip service considering that these some countries are partly to blame for the slow and almost non existent economic growth in third world countries. As already mentioned, the subsidies given by the core countries for some of the products in the agricultural and textile industry has been one of the greatest pitfalls for the third world countries. This is because, they are not able to compete in a market that has products which are already subsides and the end result is that these sectors end up collapsing. If the western countries are indeed committed in helping third world countries revive their economies and actually boost their economic growth, they would not offer such subsidies being fully aware of their impacts. Other than the subsidies, it has been noted that all the imports that western countries make from third countries are subjected to more than 30 percent above what is considered average duty (Frieden 23). Paying attention to these observations, it becomes clear, that there is a deliberate and absolute attempt by the western world to ensure that third world countries have no way of catching in terms of economic development and stability. We are not saying that is wrong for the western world to sell to us that which we are not able to produce. Our bone of contention is when we make something and they on the other hand make something similar and sell it at a considerably lower price than we are selling thereby out rightly pushing us out of business. The commitment by 1st world countries must be more than just lip service a nd empty promises. Instead, measures which are tangible in nature must be seen to be out in place so as to aid the third world countries become equality economically stable. However, having set the record straight, we must revisit the issue of capitalism being the cause of poverty and as already mentioned, this is a big misconception. Third world countries nee to be encouraged to open their markets so tat foreign investment can come into their country and this will be their first step in ensuring that they gain economic growth. Economic analysts argue that while it is true that there is great inequality especially between the developed and the developing world, it is a big mistake to blame this discrepancy to capitalism. The discrepancies and inequalities that exist between first world countries and third world countries can be attributed to other factors such as the ones discussed above including the trade barriers that first world countries impose making it difficult for third wor ld countries to trade freely. Conclusion The reason why the issue of inequality has remained controversial even when it is so apparent that it exists is because of some unanswered questions. To begin with, some analysts pose the question that, what is used to measure inequality? Just because a country has certain resources and another does not have does not make the former to be more equal than the latter. The other question that is frequently asked is, what is wrong in one country attaining economic stability before the other, after all, we all cannot get there at the same time? Those are very critical questions in addressing the issue of inequality and whether capitalism has any role to play in the inequality. It has been argued that those countries that classified as poor do not necessarily experience poverty. This is because poverty as a concept is relative in the sense that instead of considering what one a country does not have analysis look at what a country does not have in relation to others. Even critics who are totally against the concept of capitalism do concur with the fact that the world in general is not where it was a couple of decades back. They also agree that the changes that have occurred over time have not happened miraculously but it is all thanks to capitalism. It is unfortunate however that capitalism has only worked for those countries that have embraced it. On the other hand, those countries that have decided to shun the concept of capitalism and globalization in general can only have themselves to blame. This is because by failing to embrace capitalism, they have in essence alienated themselves and the result of this has been lack of economic development, economic stagnation and redundancy in economic growth. With capitalism come freedom and liberty. The concept of open markets and free trade has come as a result of capitalism. Whether to embrace the concept is a choice that individual countries are supposed to make. If they feel tha t they do not want to be part of the global network, then it only means that they have alienated themselves. No country can grown isolation, neither is there any economy that can stabilize on its own. Foreign investment is one of the core pillars of ay economy, be it through exports, tourism or any other kind of investment. Therefore, when countries close up avenues for foreign investment to come in, then such a country cannot expect to prosper much in terms of economic development. In view of the above discussion, one may say that the inequality that exists in the world today and especially between the core and the periphery countries is not as a result of capitalism per se but other factors including failure by poor countries to embrace the concept that is capitalism. It is important that poor countries are made to see the benefits of capitalism because it is only then they will accept top embrace the concept and in so doing will catch up with the affluent countries if not become more stable economically than these countries. Works Cited Biel, Robert. Global Capitalism: Its Dynamics and the Impact on the Prospects of Poor Countries. California: Zed Books, 2000. Centeno, Miguel and Joseph, Cohen. Global Capitalism: a Sociological Perspective. California: Polity, 2010. Frieden, Jeffry. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. Mexico: W.W. Norton. 2007. Harvey, David. Spaces of Global Capitalism. New Jersey: Verso, 2006. Hutton, Will and Anthony Giddens. Global Capitalism. California: New Press, 2001. Kegley, Charles and Shannon Blanton. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. New York: Cengage Learning, 2009. Noberg, Johan. In Defense of Global Capitalism. New York: Cato Institute, 2003. Peet, Richard. Global Capitalism: Theories of Societal Development. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1991. Ross, Robert and Kent Trachte. Global Capitalism: the New Leviathan. London: Suny Press, 1990. Soros, George. The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open S ociety Endangered. New York: Public Affairs, 1998. This essay on Capitalism and World Inequality was written and submitted by user Deven Joyce to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Get a job in sales with no experience

Get a job in sales with no experience Are you facing this classic career conundrum: You’re interested in getting a job in sales, which often requires sales experience, but you’re new to the field and don’t know how to break in. How do you get a job that often requires experience when you’re just starting out?Don’t let these questions derail you from pursuing a career in sales- there are pathways forward, even without a packed resume. Consider the following strategies if you’re interested in getting a job in sales but lack experience.Start at the bottom.This is a traditional way of starting out in a new industry or field- but it’s still relevant and effective today! Consider working under an experienced salesperson or sales team in an industry that interests you- perhaps as an assistant or intern if feasible- and make the most of that opportunity to learn the ropes and get your feet wet. Not only will you learn the ins and outs of sales, you’ll also have valuable exp erience that you can include on your resume.Highlight transferable skills.Revisit your resume in an effort to spin the work experience you do have to highlight your â€Å"sales potential.† Think about the qualities that good salespeople possess- are you talented at public speaking and delivering presentations? Do you have experience convincing colleagues of the value of your ideas on projects? Perhaps you’re a negotiating whiz with a track record of proven results? These are all transferable skills- they’ve served you well in your current or past positions and they’re potentially valuable skills in the world of sales. Make sure your resume’s bullet points and your cover letters make a convincing case for why this is true.Sell yourself in interviews.If you’ve followed the previous advice and made a great case in your resume and cover letter regarding your transferable skills and have landed an interview for a sales job, then congratulations- you’ve made a big first step forward. Your next step is to consider your interview as your first big sales challenge- you’re about to face a potentially tough â€Å"client† and your goal is to â€Å"sell† them on the idea that you’re worth taking a chance on!Before the day of the interview, make sure your persuasive skills are razor sharp, come equipped with real-world examples of how you’ve used your transferable, sales-related skills in previous positions effectively, and practice selling individuals- perhaps a friend, colleague, or family member- on the idea of hiring you for a sales job. Consider this time and effort an investment in your career goals.Do your homework.Another feather you can add to your job-hunting cap is a deep knowledge of each company you’re pursuing, along with some core industry knowledge. Invest some time in researching the field and how the company stacks up against the competition. Look for things that imp ress you about the company and be sure to include them in your cover letter as reasons why you’re eager to join the team. Also consider learning and dropping a few key sales industry terms in your cover letter- but don’t overdo it or it could come off as more pandering than knowledgeable.Face the challenge!When you’re going after a job in sales but have little or no experience, you’re facing an uphill challenge. You need to work extra hard in order to tip the odds in your favor, and the strategies listed here will help you do just that. The rest is up to you!